Journal Ethics Policy
World Digital Library: An International Journal
World Digital Libraries: An International Journal is a biennial, internationally peer-reviewed journal published by The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI) since 2008. The journal disseminates high-quality research articles that offer original theoretical frameworks and empirical case studies concerning the evolution, maintenance, and distribution of digital information, emphasizing the research and integration of knowledge at the intersection of resources and development. This policy details out ethical behaviour of all stakeholders involved in the process of publishing articles in this journal, which include author, editors and peer-reviewers. The World Digital Libraries: An International Journal (WDL) is committed to maintaining the highest standards of integrity, transparency, and accountability in scholarly publishing. This ethical policy is guided by the
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Core Practices and aims to ensure a fair, transparent, and rigorous publication process.
1. Guiding Principles
- Adherence to COPE Core Practices for editors, authors, reviewers, and publishers.
- Compliance with international standards on authorship, conflicts of interest, peer review, plagiarism, and data integrity.
For more details, refer to COPE Guidelines.
2. Duties and Responsibilities
A. Authors
- Originality and Plagiarism: Authors should ensure that they have written entirely original work, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, it should be appropriately cited or quoted. All manuscripts will undergo plagiarism checks using advanced detection tools. Authors of original research should
present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance.
Underlying data should be represented accurately in the article. An article should contain sufficient detail and references
to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are
unacceptable. All references should be real and discoverable. All references must be complete using the journal's reference
style and the authors should ensure completeness of a reference, such as, authors’ names, article title, journal name, year,
volume, issue, and pages, in case of a journal article. All fictitious references should be omitted.
- Data Integrity and Sharing: Authors are required to ensure data accuracy, provide supporting datasets where feasible, and comply with open data principles. Authors should deposit data in recognized repositories and include data availability statements. Authors may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with an article for
editorial review, and should retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.
- Multiple Publications: An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
- Authorship Criteria: Authors must meet authorship standards, contributing significantly to the research and writing process. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. A student is usually listed as principal author on any multiple-authored publication that substantially derives from the student’s dissertation or thesis. Individuals who provided writing assistance, e.g. from a copy editor or specialist communications company, do not qualify as authors and should be included in the acknowledgements section.
Any changes in authorship post-submission must be justified and agreed upon by all co-authors.
- Corresponding Author: The corresponding author is responsible for communicating with the journal for publication. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors are included in the article, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the article and have
agreed to its submission for publication.
- Acknowledgment: Proper attribution of others' work must always be acknowledged. Individuals who may receive recognition include a person who offered solely technical assistance or a department chair who rendered simply general support. Authors must reference publications that have significantly
shaped the character of the presented study.
- Acknowledgment of Funding Sources: Sources of funding for the research reported in the article should be duly acknowledged at the end of the article and before the references.
- Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
- Errors in Published Works: When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author's obligation to promptly notify the Editor/Managing Editor and cooperate with the editors to retract or correct the article.
B. Editors
- Manuscript Acceptance: The editor will determine the publication of articles based on the peer review report. The validity of the work in question and its significance to scholars and readers will consistently support such conclusions. The editor, managing editor, and associate editor must adhere to the journal's policies while determining the inclusion or exclusion of an article. They lack the authority to sway the reviewers engaged in the blind peer evaluation of the manuscript.
- Transparent Evaluation: Editors guarantee an unbiased, double-blind peer review procedure grounded in merit and pertinence to the journal’s scope. Manuscripts shall be evaluated solely on their intellectual merit, regardless of the authors' colour, gender, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, nationality, closeness to editors or political stance.
- Peer Review: The editor/managing editor shall ensure that the peer review process is fair, unbiased, and timely. The editor shall select reviewers who have suitable expertise in the relevant field. The editor/managing editor shall review all disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and suggestions for self-citation made by reviewers in order to determine whether there is any potential for bias.
- Confidentiality: Editors will not disclose manuscript details to anyone outside the editorial process. The editor, managing editor, associate editor and any other editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers and other editorial advisers.
- Disclosure: Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used by anyone who has viewed/read the manuscript (while handling it) in his or her own research without the written consent of the author.
- Conflict of Interest: Editors must recuse themselves in case of conflicts.
- Journal Metrics: Editors must not manipulate metrics.
- Published Record Vigilance: Editors must address and correct any misconduct.
- Editorial Board: Consult with board members for journal development.
- Ethical Oversight: Follow COPE procedures for handling misconduct.
C. Reviewers
- Confidentiality: Manuscripts must remain confidential and not be used for personal gain.
- Contribution: Double-blind review helps editorial decision and article improvement.
- Ethical Awareness: Identify uncited or overlapping work and report to the editor.
- Promptness: Inform the editor if unable to review.
- Objective Assessment: Provide unbiased and constructive feedback.
- Reviewers must disclose any conflicts and decline review when necessary.
D. Publisher (TERI)
- Ethical Support: Support all parties in following COPE guidelines.
- Misconduct Handling: Address misconduct per COPE guidelines, issue corrections/retractions as needed.
- Digital Preservation: Maintain long-term access to articles via institutional repositories.
- Editorial Board: Support and involve board members in outreach, review, and improvement of the journal.
- Identifying New Topics: Assist in developing special issues and enhancing scope.
- Editorials and Book Reviews: Board members may contribute short pieces.
- Outreach: Promote the journal within networks.
- Peer Review Support: Help identify and act as reviewers when needed.
- Competing Interests: Must be disclosed by editorial board members.
- Open Access Licensing: Journal operates under CC BY-NC; recent two issues are restricted.
3. Handling Misconduct
Allegations of misconduct are handled per COPE flowcharts. Actions may include:
- Article correction
- Retraction with explanation
- Temporary submission bans
See COPE Flowcharts for detailed procedures.
4. Appeals and Complaints
Appeals and complaints are reviewed by an independent editorial or ethics committee within TERI.
5. Licensing Terms and AI-Generated Content
A. Licensing and Access Policy
- Hybrid Open Access with latest two issues restricted.
- Articles published under CC BY-NC 4.0 License:
- Allows remix, adaptation for non-commercial use with attribution.
- Commercial reuse needs permission.
B. AI-Generated Content Policy
- Disclosure required for AI use in writing, analysis, or translation.
- AI cannot be credited as an author.
- Authors are fully responsible for verifying AI-generated content.
- AI use should be described in the Methods or Acknowledgments section.
Example: "The authors used OpenAI's ChatGPT to assist in language editing. All content has been reviewed and verified by the authors."
References