 Contents
of Vol.18(1) June 2025 |
Latest issue
Recent Issues
Recent Issues (open access)
Editorial Board |
|
Dr Jagdish Arora, Advisor, National Board of Accrediation, New Delhi, India Dr Alejandro Bia, CIO-DEMI, Centro de Investigación Operativa, Departamento de Estadística, Matemáticas e Informática, Área de Lenguajes y Sistemas Informáticos, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Elche, España Prof. José Luis Borbinha, Professor, INESC-ID/IST, Information Systems Group Lisbon Technical University, Portugal Prof. Daniel Chandran, PhD, Professor, Faculty of Information Technology University of Technology, Sydney, Australia Prof. Ching-chih Chen, PhD, Professor, Graduate School of Library and Information Science Simmons College, USA Prof. Gobinda Chowdhury, PhD, Professor, Department of Mathematics and Information Sciences, Northumbria University, UK Prof. J N Gautam, Pro Vice-Chancellor, Jiwaji University, Madhya Pradesh, India Prof. Ee-Peng Lim, PhD, Professor, School of Information Systems Singapore Management University, Singapore Dr Debal Chandra Kar, Librarian, Ambedkar University, New Delhi, India Prof. Gary Marchionini, Professor, School of Information and Library Science University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA Dr Usha Mujoo-Munshi, Chief Librarian, Indian Institute of Public Administration, India Prof. Dr Erich J Neuhold, Professor, Computer Science, University of Vienna, Austria Prof. Paul Nieuwenhuysen, Professor, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium Mr John Paschoud, Information Systems Engineer of the Library London School of Economics, UK Dr A R D Prasad, Professor, Documentation Research & Training Centre, Indian Statistical Institute, Bangalore, India Dr Ratna Sanyal, Professor, Computer Science Engineering, School of Engineering and Technology, BML Munjal University, India Dr V N Shukla, Director (IT), Election Commision of India, India Prof. Ingeborg Torvik Sølvberg, Professor, Department of Computer and Information Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway Dr M G Sreekumar, Librarian, Indian Institute of Management, Kozhikode, Kerala Prof. Shigeo Sugimoto, University of Library and Information Science, Japan Prof. P Tapio Varis, Acting President, Global University System, Professor and Chair of Media Education, University of Tampere, Finland Prof. Shalini R Urs, Executive Director, International School of Information Management, University of Mysore, Mysore, India Prof. Ian H Witten, Professor, Department of Computer Science, University of Waikato, New Zealand Editor-in-Chief Editor Associate Editor Assistant Editor |
Author Guidelines |
| World Digital Libraries is an international peer-reviewed biannual journal. The journal seeks quality research papers that present original theoretical approaches. It also seeks experimental case studies related to digital library developments, maintenance, and dissemination of digital information focusing on research and integration of knowledge at the interface of resources and development. The journal will, therefore, keep readers abreast with the current developments and contain articles, reviews, current developments, and case studies, encompassing the following areas.
Articles should examine concepts, analyses, and case studies of important issues in the field. Book reviews should be of recent publications in the field, to be reviewed by an independent reviewer. Commentaries should discuss critical issues in the field.
Submissions Authors are requested to send a soft copy (in Microsoft Word format) of their contribution to the editor, either in a CD or as an e-mail attachment. All submissions will be peer-reviewed using the criteria of originality, accuracy, and quality of contribution in these fields.
Presentation of Manuscripts Articles must be original, in English, and should not exceed 8,000 words. The main text should be double-spaced with headings and sub-headings clearly indicated in the text. All tables, figures, and equations should be numbered in Arabic numerals and clearly cited in the text. All measurements should be in metric (SI) units. The manuscript should be arranged in the order given below.
Shorter Items The following shorter items are also welcome and must be typed in the same way as major articles.
In-house Style: References In the text, the surname of the author(s) followed by the year of publication of the reference should be given, for example, (Hall 1993). In case of several publications by the one author or by a group of author(s) in one year, use notations ‘1993a’, ‘1993b’, and so on. Up to three authors can be mentioned in text references; more than three authors should be limited to the first three authors’ names followed by ‘et al.’ References must be listed alphabetically at the end of the paper (double spaced) and should conform to the following style.
For journals Davis G R. 1990; Energy for planet earth; Scientific American 263(3): 55–62
For books Carmichael J B and Strzepek K M. 1987; Industrial Water Use and Treatment Practices; London: Cassell Tycooly. 291 pp.
For chapters of edited books Sintak Y. 1992; Models and projections of energy use in the Soviet Union; In International Energy Economics, pp. 1–53 edited by T Steiner; London: Chapman and Hall. 350 pp.
For grey literature Togeby M and Jacobsen U. 1996; How conflicting goals concerning environment and transport influence the policy process?; Paper presented at the Conference on Transport, Energy and Environment, 3–4 October, Helsingor, Denmark
WBCSD (World Business Council for Sustainable Development) and UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). 1998
Industry, fresh water, and sustainable development Details available at <www.gm-unccd.org/FIELD/Private/WBCSD/freshwater.pdf>, last accessed on January 9, 2004
Footnotes Authors are requested to use as few footnotes as possible, and keep their length to the minimum. Footnotes should be indicated in the text by superior Arabic numerals, which run consecutively through the paper. They should be grouped in order of appearance at the bottom of the concerned page in numerical order and must be double-spaced.
Accepted Manuscripts On acceptance, contributors are requested to provide the editor the final version of the article in soft and hard copy. Please observe the following instructions.
Proofs One set of proofs will be sent to the author before publication, which should be returned promptly within 48 hours of receipt. Authors are urged to check the proofs carefully as late corrections cannot be accepted.
Offprints Apart from one free copy of the journal to the authors, 10 free offprints will be supplied to the first author. Further offprints and copies of the journal can be purchased at a reasonable cost, if ordered when sending the final copy of the article, or when returning the proofs.
Copyright The responsibility for the contents of the paper rests with the authors, not with the editor or the publisher. Contributions are accepted for refereeing on the understanding that they have been submitted only to this journal and not to any other journal. Only when each author signs and submits the CTA (Copyright Transfer Agreement) can TERI Press publish the article. This CTA enables TERI Press to protect the copyright material for the authors, but does not affect the authors’ proprietary rights. The CTA covers the exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute the articles, including reprints, photographic reproductions, or any other reproductions of similar nature and translations, and includes the right to adapt the article for use in conjunction with computer systems and programmes, including reproduction or publication in machine-readable form and incorporation into retrieval systems. Authors are responsible for obtaining, from the copyright holder, permission to reproduce any figures for which copyright exists. |
Journal Ethics Policy
World Digital Library: An International Journal
World Digital Libraries: An International Journal is a biennial, internationally peer-reviewed journal published by The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI) since 2008. The journal disseminates high-quality research articles that offer original theoretical frameworks and empirical case studies concerning the evolution, maintenance, and distribution of digital information, emphasizing the research and integration of knowledge at the intersection of resources and development. This policy details out ethical behaviour of all stakeholders involved in the process of publishing articles in this journal, which include author, editors and peer-reviewers. The World Digital Libraries: An International Journal (WDL) is committed to maintaining the highest standards of integrity, transparency, and accountability in scholarly publishing. This ethical policy is guided by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Core Practices and aims to ensure a fair, transparent, and rigorous publication process.
1. Guiding Principles
- Adherence to COPE Core Practices for editors, authors, reviewers, and publishers.
- Compliance with international standards on authorship, conflicts of interest, peer review, plagiarism, and data integrity.
For more details, refer to COPE Guidelines.
2. Duties and Responsibilities
A. Authors
- Originality and Plagiarism: Authors should ensure that they have written entirely original work, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, it should be appropriately cited or quoted. All manuscripts will undergo plagiarism checks using advanced detection tools. Authors of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the article. An article should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. All references should be real and discoverable. All references must be complete using the journal's reference style and the authors should ensure completeness of a reference, such as, authors’ names, article title, journal name, year, volume, issue, and pages, in case of a journal article. All fictitious references should be omitted.
- Data Integrity and Sharing: Authors are required to ensure data accuracy, provide supporting datasets where feasible, and comply with open data principles. Authors should deposit data in recognized repositories and include data availability statements. Authors may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with an article for editorial review, and should retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.
- Multiple Publications: An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
- Authorship Criteria: Authors must meet authorship standards, contributing significantly to the research and writing process. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. A student is usually listed as principal author on any multiple-authored publication that substantially derives from the student’s dissertation or thesis. Individuals who provided writing assistance, e.g. from a copy editor or specialist communications company, do not qualify as authors and should be included in the acknowledgements section. Any changes in authorship post-submission must be justified and agreed upon by all co-authors.
- Corresponding Author: The corresponding author is responsible for communicating with the journal for publication. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors are included in the article, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the article and have agreed to its submission for publication.
- Acknowledgment: Proper attribution of others' work must always be acknowledged. Individuals who may receive recognition include a person who offered solely technical assistance or a department chair who rendered simply general support. Authors must reference publications that have significantly shaped the character of the presented study.
- Acknowledgment of Funding Sources: Sources of funding for the research reported in the article should be duly acknowledged at the end of the article and before the references.
- Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
- Errors in Published Works: When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author's obligation to promptly notify the Editor/Managing Editor and cooperate with the editors to retract or correct the article.
B. Editors
- Manuscript Acceptance: The editor will determine the publication of articles based on the peer review report. The validity of the work in question and its significance to scholars and readers will consistently support such conclusions. The editor, managing editor, and associate editor must adhere to the journal's policies while determining the inclusion or exclusion of an article. They lack the authority to sway the reviewers engaged in the blind peer evaluation of the manuscript.
- Transparent Evaluation: Editors guarantee an unbiased, double-blind peer review procedure grounded in merit and pertinence to the journal’s scope. Manuscripts shall be evaluated solely on their intellectual merit, regardless of the authors' colour, gender, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, nationality, closeness to editors or political stance.
- Peer Review: The editor/managing editor shall ensure that the peer review process is fair, unbiased, and timely. The editor shall select reviewers who have suitable expertise in the relevant field. The editor/managing editor shall review all disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and suggestions for self-citation made by reviewers in order to determine whether there is any potential for bias.
- Confidentiality: Editors will not disclose manuscript details to anyone outside the editorial process. The editor, managing editor, associate editor and any other editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers and other editorial advisers.
- Disclosure: Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used by anyone who has viewed/read the manuscript (while handling it) in his or her own research without the written consent of the author.
- Conflict of Interest: Editors will recuse themselves from handling submissions where conflicts of interest exist.
- Journal Metrics: The editor/managing editor/associate editor must not attempt to influence the journal’s ranking by artificially increasing any journal metric. In particular, the editor shall not require that references to that (or any other) journal’s articles be included except for genuine scholarly reasons and authors should not be required to include references to the editor’s own articles or products and services in which the editor has an interest.
- Published Record Vigilance: The editor should work to safeguard the integrity of the published record by reviewing and assessing reported or suspected misconduct. An editor presented with convincing evidence of misconduct should arrange the prompt publication of a correction, retraction, expression of concern, or other correction to the record, as may be relevant.
- Editorial Board: The editor will engage in discussion with the Editorial Board in periodic intervals and seek guidance for improvement in journal quality, scope adjustment, outreach etc purpose.
- Ethical Oversight: Editors are responsible for handling misconduct allegations following COPE flowcharts for plagiarism, redundant publication, or authorship disputes.
C. Reviewers
- Confidentiality: Reviewers must maintain the confidentiality of manuscripts and refrain from using unpublished material for personal advantage. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor. Privileged information or ideas obtained through double blind peer review must be kept confidential and should not be used for personal advantage.
- Contribution of Double-Blind Peer Review: Double blind peer review assists the editors to make decisions and also assists the author in improving the article. The two assigned reviewers should not know the author's identity, as any identifying information will be removed from the manuscript before sending it for review by the Editorial team. Reviewers' comments to the Editors are confidential, while relevant comments to the authors will be shared with the authors for articles improvements, however, any such comments would be made anonymous. The names of the reviewers remain strictly confidential throughout the publication process; with their identities known only to the Managing Editor, Editor and Associate Editor.
- Alertness to Ethical Issues: Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that had been previously reported elsewhere should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also bring to the notice of the editor/managing editor any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published article of which they have personal knowledge.
- Promptness: Any selected reviewer who feels unqualified to review the assigned manuscript or unable to provide a timely review should convey the same to the editor.
- Objective Assessment: Reviewers should provide constructive, unbiased feedback within the agreed timeline and maintain the standards of objectivity. There shall be no personal criticism of the author. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
- Conflict of Interest: Reviewers must disclose any potential conflicts and decline to review if necessary. Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors or institutions connected to the articles.
D. Publisher (TERI)
- Support for Ethical Standards: TERI supports editors, authors, and reviewers in following ethical guidelines, including COPE recommendations.
- Misconduct Handling: TERI investigates ethical concerns, including plagiarism, data falsification, and conflicts of interest, and takes corrective actions such as issuing retractions, corrections, or expressions of concern in line with COPE Retraction Guidelines.
- Digital Preservation: TERI ensures the long-term digital preservation of all published articles through our institutional repositories to guarantee permanent access.
- Editorial Board Members: The editorial board members should serve as representatives for the journal for a specific period, usually 3 years term. They can identify potential authors, readers, and subscribers in their respective networks, countries and regions. Additionally, they should motivate their students and colleagues to contribute and reference the journal.
- Identifying New Topics: Editorial board members will help in identification of new topics for the journal and special editions. They should provide direction to the journal by giving feedback on past issues and giving suggestions on both subject matter and potential authors.
- Contributing Editorials: Editorial board members can contribute by writing occasional editorials, short articles and also carry out book review.
- Outreach: They will approach potential contributors and endorse the journal to authors, readers and subscribers.
- Peer Review: They should act as a ready team of potential reviewers. They should help to identify peer reviewers and provide second opinions on articles (i.e., where there is a conflict between reviewers).
- Competing Interests: Editorial board members should declare all competing/conflicting interests, if any. If they are unsure about a potential competing or conflicting interest they should raise it to the editor. Competing interests may be personal, financial, intellectual, professional, political or religious in nature.
- Open Access Licensing: WDL Journal is a hybrid Open Access Journal dedicated to the unrestricted distribution of knowledge, with the exception of the most recent two issues, which are restricted. It operates under Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial (CC BY-NC) licensing, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution for non-commercial purposes.
3. Handling Misconduct
All allegations of misconduct are addressed promptly using COPE’s standardized procedures. Possible actions include:
- Correction of the article.
- Retraction with a clear explanation. (COPE guidelines)
- Banning future submissions from the offending authors for a specified period.
For detailed steps, refer to the COPE Flowcharts: COPE Flowcharts.
4. Appeals and Complaints
Authors and reviewers may appeal editorial decisions or raise complaints regarding unethical behaviour. Appeals will be reviewed by an independent editorial board or ethics committee within TERI.
5. WDL Licensing terms, Clauses On AI-Generated Content
A. Licensing and Access Policy
- WDL Journal is a hybrid Open Access Journal dedicated to the unrestricted distribution of knowledge, with the exception of the most recent two issues, which are restricted.
- All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- This license allows others to remix, adapt, and build upon the work for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution is given.
- Commercial reuse requires prior permission from the journal.
For license details: CC BY-NC 4.0 License.
B. AI-Generated Content Policy
- Authors must disclose the use of AI tools in manuscript preparation, data analysis, visualization, or translation.
- AI tools cannot be credited as authors. The responsibility for the content remains solely with the human authors.
- AI-generated content must be reviewed and validated by the authors to ensure accuracy and integrity.
- The Methods or Acknowledgments section should specify how AI tools were used.
Example: "The authors used OpenAI's ChatGPT to assist in language editing. All content has been reviewed and verified by the authors."